TopTurniere Fide-WM 2006 - Gibt es noch Hoffnung? Kramnik wendet sich erneut an Ilyumzhinov
30.09.2006 - Vladimir Kramnik hat sich in einem weiteren offenen Brief erneut an Fide Präsident Kirsan Ilyumzhinov gewendet und aufgezeigt, unter welchen Bedingungen er die Weltmeisterschaft fortzusetzen gedenke. Er führt an, dass der Protest von Topalov am Ruhetag abzuweisen gewesen wäre, da er nicht innerhalb der ersten zwei Stunden nach der vierten Partie eingegangen sei. Ferner gehe aus dem Vertrag klar hervor, dass es per Protest nicht möglich ist, nachträglich etwas an den Regeln und Konditionen zu ändern. Somit habe die fünfte Partie unter irregulären Umständen stattgefunden und müsse beim Stand von 3 : 1 wiederholt werden.
Neben der Rücknahme des Vertragsbruchs fordert Kramnik, dass die Badezimmer
in den Ruheräumen wieder geöffnet und dafür vor und nach
jeder Begegnung inspiziert werden. Ferner wünscht er sich
personelle Veränderungen im Beschwerde-Komitee, da die bisherigen
Mitglieder deutlich zu Gunsten von Topalov entscheiden würden.
Auch dürfen die Videoaufzeichnungen der Ruheräume lediglich den
Schiedsrichtern nicht aber den Teams der Spieler zugänglich
gemacht werden. Abschließend erwartet Kramnik eine Entschuldigung
von Silvio Danailov, der ihn in dessen Protestschreiben mehrfach
beleidigt und ihm Betrug unterstellt hätte.
Sollten diese Bedingungen
erfüllt werden, sei Kramnik bereit, das Match beim Stand von 3 : 1
für ihn wieder aufzunehmen und die fünfte Partie nachzuholen.
Open Letter
To
FIDE President
Kirsan Iljumshinov
Russian Chess Federation
Elista, 29. September 2006
Requests of Vladimir Kramnik
· To proceed with GAME
5
Clause 3.17.1., Schedule 2 of the contract:
“All protests must be submitted in writing to the Appeals
Committee not more than 2 hours after the relevant playing session.”
The protest made by the Topalov Team were not made within this
window after game 4 (27 September 2006) but only hitted the FIDE
Office and the Appeals Committee on the restday (28 September
2006). Therefore the protests are not even relevant and should
have been rejected by the Appeals Committee immediately.
Clause 3.18.3., Schedule 2 of the contract:
“After the World Chess Championship Committee agrees with
the Organizers on the arrangements in respect of the tournament
hall, facilities etc. etc. etc……., no objections from the
participants shall be acceptable as long as the conditions are in
accordance with the rights of the players granted in their
agreements.”
This clause clearly underlines the statement made in today’s Open
letter:
“By starting the match both participants agreed all the playing
conditions de facto and de jure and the conditions are therefore
legally binding. Any change of the playing conditions without a
good reason would in our understanding request the approval of
both players which is not the case here.”
Therefore it is clear that the Appeals Committee did a completely
wrong decision and was obviously not even aware of the Rules and
Regulations. The decision of Chief Arbiter Mr. Gijssen to forfeit
game 5 was clearly based on a wrong decision of the Appeals
Committee and shall be nullified.
Mr. Kramnik is ready to continue the match and to play the 5th
game (by a leading score of 3:1) on the conditions that were
accepted prior to the start of the match.
· Toilet issue
The toilets connected to the restrooms shall be opened again. This
request is in accordance with clauses 3.17.1. and 3.18.3 (see
above) and in the general understanding that by starting of the
match both participants agreed to all the playing conditions. Any
change of the playing conditions without a good reason would
request the approval of both players which is not the case here.
Mr. Kramnik is ready to accept even stricter controls by sealing
the toilets before and after inspections. Inspections shall be
done before and after each game.
· Exchange of members of the Appeals Committee
We repeat that the Kramnik team does not trust the objectivity of
the Appeals Committee anymore. It is evident from this letter and
our first Open Letter today that the existing Appeals Committee is
biased and incompetent. Mr. Kramnik strongly insists once again
that the members of the Appeals Committee will be exchanged
immediately.
· Access to Recordings
As Mr. Kramnik in the press conference stated he did not sign the
contract for acting in a reality show. The recordings shall be
observed by the arbiters. Neither Team Topalov nor Team Kramnik
shall have access to the recordings. Investigations shall be in
the sole responsibility of the Arbiters.
· Requested Apology
Last but not least Mr. Kramnik believes that Mr. Danailov should
apologize to Mr. Kramnik in writing. Remarks such as:
“If the match were to continue, the World Champion will refrain
from shaking hands with Mr. Kramnik before the games and will not
take part in joint press conferences with him.” and “Veselin
Topalov is disturbed by the suspicious behavior of his opponent
Mr. Vladimir Kramnik who takes his most significant decisions in
the bathroom.” are clearly insulting.
On behalf of Vladimir Kramnik
Yours sincerely,
Carsten Hensel
(Manager to Vladimir Kramnik, Classical World Chess Champion)